In my classes, I often used the question structure of "compare and contrast, and then evaluate..." It is a useful question and taught bigger and more important skills than just gathering facts. It gave students a method or a rubric that they could use throughout their lives. With this structure, you can determine the value of things, the correctness or "rightness" of most things. So, which car to buy or where to go to college or where to live. And, I suppose and fervently hope, who to vote for and who to respect as a leader.
I freely admit that the process is important but I have to say that it doesn't always lead to the best or right conclusion. Some people have other inputs which affect the results. Today seemed to me to be a perfect example or opportunity, though, to use this process.
One one hand, you have Jimmy Carter. The many recent eulogies have listed his many identities: son of Georgia, farmer, father, husband, veteran, businessman, representative, governor, president, peacemaker, builder, Christian, and many other selves which made the man. And remember, those earned titles of who he was came with many, many, adjectives, most of them positive. Loving, faithful, successful, caring, dedicated, honest, servant, and humble were just some of these adjectives that celebrated the man. None called him perfect as he wasn't, but when you compare or contrast him to many, well...
Many or most of us lack in our lives compared to Carter's. At best we need to look at his life and see it as aspirational and something to work towards. I struggled today, though, because it is our nature to compare and contrast presidents and with Trump and Carter, the differences are stark. It was particularly jarring today as I read today's news. Trump, as a venal, dishonest, convicted felon in 75 minutes denigrated the whole judicial system, threatened our neighbors with territorial expansion, ignored 75 years of the greatest military and political alliance ever, lied about elections, the economy, his record and and and... This is just a brief recap-- an actual transcript is terrifying. More than anything, if you compare and contrast and then evaluate the two men, I at least, find one former president lacking in character and content.
So what? That's a good question. The crux of this rant is that we need to keep comparing and contrasting and then evaluating. I suspect that there will be plenty of differences in which to apply this rubric. I think that we could do a bit better evaluating. Some people are simply lacking in all those positive adjectives ascribed to the man we are honoring today.